Not a Happy Family (2021)

5 Stars · Linda’s Rating
Page Count
349 pages
Release Date
2021-07-27

Jump to Section

⚠ Full Spoilers Ahead. This page contains complete plot summaries, the ending, and all major reveals. Turn back if you don’t want to be spoiled.
  • Graphic physical violence and murder
  • Ligature strangulation
  • Throat slitting and stabbing
  • Blood, bodily decay, and disturbing crime-scene imagery
  • Patricide
  • Death by hanging
  • Domestic violence
  • Emotional and verbal abuse
  • Child abuse
  • Child-on-child and sibling violence
  • Poisoning / attempted murder
  • Stalking and obsessive behavior
  • Alcoholism and heavy alcohol use
  • Recreational drug use
  • Terminal illness / pancreatic cancer
  • Infertility and fertility treatments
  • Financial fraud and exploitation

Fred and Sheila Merton are wealthy, deeply unhappy parents whose three adult children all have reasons to hate them. At Easter dinner in their Hudson Valley mansion, Fred viciously humiliates Catherine, Dan, and Jenna, then announces that he and Sheila are selling the house. He also threatens changes to his will that could cost the children millions.

The next morning, longtime housekeeper and former nanny Irena Dabrowski discovers Fred and Sheila murdered. Sheila has been strangled, while Fred has had his throat slit and been stabbed fourteen times. Assuming one of the children did it, Irena instinctively protects them by washing a bloody carving knife and returning it to the knife block.

Detectives Eric Reyes and Barr quickly discover that all three siblings have huge financial motives—and all three lied about Easter night. Dan secretly went driving for hours. Catherine left her house around the time of the murders. Jenna lied about boyfriend Jake Brenner spending the night when he had actually returned to New York.

The family finances make everything even messier. Fred’s will leaves most of his $26 million estate divided among four children, not three. The surprise fourth heir is Rose Cutter, Catherine’s longtime friend, who is actually Fred’s daughter from an affair with Rose’s mother, Ellen. Rose already knew the truth because a law-firm employee leaked the will to her. She’s also hiding another crime: she took $500,000 from Dan for a supposedly private mortgage investment, forged the paperwork, and lost his money speculating in stocks.

Suspicion initially falls heavily on Dan when police find disposable protective coveralls and booties in his garage. But Catherine has an even more disturbing secret. She admits to husband Ted that she drove to her parents’ house that night and found them already murdered. Convinced Dan must have done it, she left without calling police—and stole a pair of diamond earrings from Sheila’s dead body on her way out.

Then Fred’s sister Audrey Stancik, who claims Fred intended to leave her half his fortune, nearly dies after someone poisons her iced tea with antifreeze.

The investigation finally turns toward Jenna. A witness remembers seeing Irena’s distinctive car outside the Merton house around the time of the murders. Irena proves she was home, but explains that all three Merton children knew where she kept her spare keys. Forensics then finds one of Jenna’s hairs inside Irena’s car.

Jenna really is the killer. After Easter dinner, she stole Dan’s protective clothing and Irena’s car, returned to her parents’ house disguised in the coveralls, strangled Sheila with an electrical cord, slit Fred’s throat, and stabbed him fourteen times. She staged a robbery, then buried the bloody clothing and stolen property beneath a concrete foundation being poured on an isolated farm. She later poisoned Audrey as well.

Reyes figures out what happened, but the evidence isn’t strong enough to convict Jenna. The hair in Irena’s car can be explained away as innocent transfer, and the physical evidence remains hidden beneath the concrete. Jenna therefore walks free while her siblings, compromised by their own lies and suspicious behavior, are in no position to expose her.

A year later, Catherine has a baby daughter and moves into the Merton mansion with Ted, although their marriage remains strained by everything he has learned about her. Rose has been prosecuted for defrauding Dan. Jenna remains free.

But Audrey hasn’t given up. When she sees that the rural property containing the concrete foundation is for sale, she realizes Jenna’s buried evidence may still be underneath it. Audrey calls the realtor and decides to buy the property herself, planning to dig up the foundation and uncover the proof that could finally put Jenna away.

Easter Dinner with the Mertons

Fred Merton has made a fortune founding Merton Robotics, but money hasn’t made his family particularly happy. He is cruel, controlling, and openly contemptuous of his three adult children, while his wife, Sheila, is anxious, submissive, and dependent on Xanax.

The family’s dysfunction is on full display when everyone gathers at Fred and Sheila’s mansion in the wealthy Hudson Valley enclave of Brecken Hill for Easter dinner. Eldest daughter Catherine is a successful dermatologist married to dentist Ted Linsmore, but she desperately wants to inherit her parents’ beautiful home. Middle child Dan is an unemployed MBA graduate drowning in financial problems after spending years expecting to take over Merton Robotics. His wife, Lisa, knows how badly he needs money. Youngest daughter Jenna is a rebellious sculptor who still lives on Fred’s monthly allowance and arrives with her struggling-artist boyfriend, Jake Brenner.

Fred seems determined to make everyone miserable. He announces that he and Sheila are selling the mansion, crushing Catherine’s assumption that it will someday be hers. He mocks her fertility struggles, then turns on Dan, explaining that he sold Merton Robotics precisely because he believed his son would destroy the company if allowed to run it. Jenna’s art receives equally vicious treatment.

By the end of dinner, everyone is furious. Catherine and Ted leave first, followed by Dan and Lisa. The family’s longtime former nanny and current housekeeper, Irena Dabrowski, also goes home, and Jenna eventually drops Jake at the train station so he can return to New York.

By the following morning, Fred and Sheila are dead.

Two Brutal Murders and Three Suspicious Children

Irena arrives at the mansion on Easter Monday and discovers Sheila’s body on the living room floor. She has been strangled. Fred is in the kitchen surrounded by blood, his throat slit and his back stabbed fourteen times.

The house appears to have been robbed. Jewelry, silver, and cash are missing, but Irena immediately suspects something much worse than a random burglary: she thinks one of the Merton children may have murdered their parents. When she spots a bloody carving knife on the kitchen floor, her instinct is to protect the children she helped raise. She washes the knife thoroughly and puts it back into the knife block, destroying potential forensic evidence before calling the police.

Detectives Eric Reyes and Barr take over the investigation. The brutality of the murders is striking, but the autopsy provides another important discovery. Fred had advanced pancreatic cancer and probably had only three or four months left to live. Whoever killed him hadn’t needed to wait much longer for nature to do the job.

For Fred’s children, however, waiting could have been financially dangerous.

All three stand to inherit millions, and all three begin lying almost immediately.

Dan and Lisa claim they were home together all night. In reality, Dan left after the disastrous dinner and drove around alone for approximately three hours, leaving Lisa to provide him with a false alibi.

Catherine and Ted also claim they stayed home, but security footage from a neighbor’s camera catches Catherine leaving at 11:09 p.m. and returning at 12:41 a.m.

Jenna’s story isn’t clean either. She initially lets police believe Jake spent the night with her, but surveillance footage proves he boarded the 8:40 p.m. train to New York.

Instead of narrowing their suspect list, Reyes and Barr discover that virtually everyone in the Merton family has something to hide.

Fred’s Will Creates Even More Suspects

Fred’s estate attorney, Walter Temple, reveals another potential motive. Fred’s widowed sister, Audrey Stancik, says her brother recently told her he intended to change his will and leave half his fortune to her. Walter confirms that Fred had scheduled an appointment with him, but Fred died before making any changes.

The existing will therefore remains valid. Irena receives $1 million, Audrey receives $1 million, and smaller amounts go to charity. Most of the remaining $26 million is divided among Fred’s children.

That’s when Catherine, Dan, and Jenna discover there are four of them.

The fourth heir is Rose Cutter, Catherine’s close friend since high school. Rose’s mother, Ellen Cutter, once worked as Fred’s secretary at Merton Robotics and had an affair with him. Rose is Fred’s illegitimate daughter—and therefore Catherine, Dan, and Jenna’s half-sister.

Even more shocking, Rose already knew.

Janet Shewcuk, a junior associate at Walter’s firm and an old law-school friend of Rose’s, illegally revealed the contents of Fred’s will to her two months before his death.

Rose has another secret involving the Mertons. Desperate for money, she convinced Dan to give her $500,000 for what she presented as a private mortgage on a wealthy man’s house. The supposed borrower was Amir Ghorbani, who lives at 22 Brecken Hill Drive.

The mortgage doesn’t exist. Rose forged the documents and gambled Dan’s $500,000 on stocks, losing it. Dan believes his investment is legitimate and has become so anxious about his money that he repeatedly drives past Ghorbani’s house at night. His strange behavior gives police yet another reason to question what he was doing around Brecken Hill.

Catherine Reveals What Really Happened That Night

A search of Dan’s garage produces a particularly alarming discovery: an opened package containing disposable protective coveralls and booties. The detectives realize the murderer could have worn protective clothing, explaining the lack of blood evidence connecting any obvious suspect to Fred’s extraordinarily bloody killing.

But Catherine soon makes an even more damaging confession to Ted.

She really did leave home on Easter night. She drove to her parents’ mansion at around 11:30 and went inside—only to discover Fred and Sheila already dead.

Catherine immediately decided Dan must have killed them. Instead of calling 911, she left, believing that delaying discovery of the bodies would give her brother more time to get away.

But she did something else first.

Sheila was wearing antique diamond stud earrings Catherine had always coveted. Seeing them on her dead mother’s ears, Catherine removed them and took them home.

When police later search Catherine’s house, they find the earrings in her jewelry box. Catherine may not have murdered her parents, but stealing jewelry from her mother’s corpse makes her look extraordinarily guilty.

Then someone apparently tries to eliminate another member of the family. Audrey is hospitalized after drinking iced tea contaminated with antifreeze. She survives and becomes convinced one of Fred’s children poisoned her.

The Evidence Finally Points to Jenna

The clue that breaks the case open comes from Carl Brink, a local man who was driving near Brecken Hill between 11 p.m. and midnight on Easter Sunday. He remembers seeing a vehicle near the Merton driveway because of its distinctive personalized license plate: IRENA D.

That seems to point directly toward Irena. But her landline records prove she was at home on a continuous phone call from 11:11 until 11:43.

Someone else must have been driving her car.

Irena explains that she keeps spare house and car keys hidden beneath a planter on her back patio. More importantly, Catherine, Dan, and Jenna all know where she keeps them.

When forensic investigators examine Irena’s vehicle, they find a single strand of hair in the driver’s seat.

It belongs to Jenna.

Jenna Murdered Both of Her Parents

The truth is that Jenna carefully planned the murders after Easter dinner.

Fred’s cruelty wasn’t the only thing driving her. During their argument, he told Jenna that he intended to change his will and give Audrey half of his fortune. If he followed through, Jenna and her siblings would lose millions.

After dropping Jake at the station, Jenna went to Dan’s unlocked garage and stole disposable coveralls, booties, and a mask, deliberately using something that could later point suspicion toward her brother. She then went to Irena’s house, retrieved the hidden spare keys, and took Irena’s car.

Wearing the protective clothing, Jenna drove back to her parents’ mansion and rang the bell. When Sheila answered the door, Jenna strangled her with an electrical cord.

She then summoned Fred into the kitchen. Approaching him from behind, she slit his throat and stabbed him fourteen times in the back.

Jenna took cash, jewelry, and silver to make the killings resemble a robbery. Afterward, she removed the bloody protective clothing, placed it and the incriminating evidence into a bag, and drove into the countryside.

She had already identified the perfect hiding place. At an isolated farm where a new outbuilding was being constructed, Jenna buried the bag beneath an area where fresh concrete was about to be poured. Once the foundation covered it, the physical evidence connecting her to the murders was effectively entombed.

Jenna was also responsible for Audrey’s poisoning. She had slipped through an open window at Audrey’s house and poured antifreeze into her iced tea, hoping to remove another threat.

Jenna Gets Away with Murder—for Now

Reyes eventually understands that Jenna killed Fred and Sheila, but knowing the truth and proving it in court are two different things.

The strongest physical evidence is the strand of Jenna’s hair found in Irena’s driver’s seat. Jenna’s defense can easily argue that the hair arrived there through innocent transfer, particularly because Jenna and Irena had physical contact. Without the buried protective clothing and stolen property, Reyes doesn’t have enough evidence to guarantee a murder conviction.

Jenna therefore remains free.

She also recognizes how effectively her family’s dysfunction protects her. Catherine, Dan, and Jenna all lied to police. All had financial motives. Catherine secretly visited the murder scene and stole Sheila’s earrings. Dan disappeared for hours and owned the protective clothing. Jenna can simply deny everything while pointing out that none of the siblings can accuse another without drawing suspicion back onto themselves.

Rose, however, doesn’t escape the consequences of her own crimes. Her fraudulent investment scheme is exposed, and she is prosecuted for stealing Dan’s $500,000.

A year after the murders, Catherine has finally given birth to a daughter. She, Ted, and the baby move into Fred and Sheila’s mansion, giving Catherine the house she wanted all along. But Ted has learned disturbing things about his wife and her family, leaving him deeply uneasy and distrustful of Catherine.

Audrey has received the $1 million Fred left her, but she hasn’t forgotten what happened—or Jenna.

Then Audrey spots a “FOR SALE” sign on the rural farm where Jenna buried the murder evidence beneath the concrete foundation. Audrey realizes that the proof everyone needs may still be sitting exactly where Jenna left it.

She calls the realtor.

Audrey intends to buy the property herself, dig up the concrete foundation, and find the evidence that could finally prove Jenna murdered Fred and Sheila.

How the Book Ends

Toward the end of Not a Happy Family, Detectives Reyes and Barr finally get what appears to be a forensic break in the Merton murder case: a single strand of Jenna Merton’s hair is found in the driver’s seat of Irena Dabrowski’s car.

The discovery supports the detectives’ growing suspicion that Jenna used Irena’s car on the night Fred and Sheila Merton were murdered. But it still isn’t enough. Jenna and her attorney point out that the hair could easily have been transferred innocently—Jenna had hugged Irena before, and Irena could have carried the hair back to her car on her clothing. With no other physical evidence connecting Jenna to the murders, the police have no grounds to arrest her.

The reader, however, soon learns that Jenna really did kill both of her parents.

Jenna’s Murder Plan

On Easter night, Fred had announced that he was considering leaving half of his $26 million fortune to his sister, Audrey Stancik. After dinner, Jenna dropped her boyfriend, Jake Brenner, at the Aylesford train station and began putting her plan into motion.

She first drove to her brother Dan’s house, slipped into his unlocked garage, and stole a disposable hazmat suit, booties, and a mask. She then went to Irena’s house, where she retrieved a spare set of house and car keys hidden beneath a planter on the back patio.

Disguised in the protective suit, Jenna drove Irena’s car to the Merton mansion.

When Sheila opened the door, Jenna chased her into the living room and strangled her with an electrical cord. She then lured Fred into the kitchen, approached him from behind, slit his throat, and stabbed him fourteen times in the back.

Jenna deliberately ransacked the master bedroom to make the killings look like a robbery. She gathered cash, silver, jewelry, and her blood-covered protective clothing into a canvas bag and took everything to a nearby rural farm property. There, she buried the evidence beneath the freshly poured concrete foundation of a new outbuilding.

Jenna is also responsible for the earlier attempt on Audrey’s life. She had secretly entered Audrey’s house through an open window and poured antifreeze into her iced tea.

The Merton Siblings’ Pact

After Audrey tells the family about the DNA evidence from Irena’s car, Catherine and Dan confront Jenna.

Instead of panicking, Jenna turns the situation back on them.

All three Merton children had motives for wanting Fred dead. All three had lied to the police. None had a completely convincing alibi. And Jenna knows something particularly damaging about Catherine: Catherine went to the mansion on Easter night, discovered Sheila’s body, and stole her mother’s antique diamond earrings directly from her dead ears before leaving without calling 911.

That secret gives Jenna leverage.

If Catherine or Dan exposes Jenna, they risk drawing renewed police attention to themselves and potentially jeopardizing their shares of the family fortune. The siblings therefore arrive at an unspoken agreement: no one tells the truth.

Jenna gets away with murder because the rest of her family is too compromised to turn her in.

One Year Later

The epilogue shows that inheriting the Merton fortune has hardly produced a happy ending.

Catherine and Ted have a baby daughter and move into the Merton mansion—the house Catherine coveted throughout the novel. But getting everything she wanted does not make Catherine happy. Ted now knows what his wife is capable of, and their marriage is poisoned by distrust.

Dan has been cleared legally, but his reputation has been destroyed. Meanwhile, Rose Cutter faces prosecution for the real estate fraud involving Dan’s $500,000 investment.

And then there is Audrey.

Audrey receives the $1 million Fred left her in his will. While driving near Jenna’s home, she notices that the rural property containing the new concrete outbuilding is for sale.

She knows what is underneath it.

Rather than simply walking away with her inheritance, Audrey calls the realtor and announces that she wants to buy the property.

The novel ends with the strong implication that Audrey intends to tear up the concrete foundation, recover the buried evidence, and finally prove that Jenna murdered Fred and Sheila.


What the Ending Means

The ending is deliberately satisfying and unsatisfying at the same time. Jenna has committed what appears to be the perfect murder, and the police cannot prove it. But she has made one crucial mistake: she buried the truth instead of destroying it.

That distinction drives the final image of the novel.

The Concrete Foundation: Buried Guilt

The concrete outbuilding is the clearest symbol in the ending. Jenna believes that by sealing the murder weapon, bloody clothing, and stolen property beneath concrete, she has permanently buried her crime.

Instead, she has created a physical monument to it.

The evidence remains intact beneath the surface, just as the Merton family’s secrets have always existed beneath its wealthy, respectable exterior. The family can cover its ugliness, lie about it, and build something new on top of it—but the truth is still there.

Audrey’s decision to buy the property suggests that buried secrets eventually demand excavation.

The Merton Mansion: Catherine Gets Exactly What She Wanted

Catherine’s fate is one of the novel’s sharpest ironies.

She has spent much of the story wanting the family mansion. In the end, she gets it. She gets the inheritance, the prestigious house, a husband, and a new baby—the outward appearance of the successful life she values.

But the mansion has become a kind of golden cage.

Catherine knows her sister murdered their parents. Ted knows Catherine discovered Sheila’s corpse and stole jewelry from it. Their wealth depends upon silence, and their marriage is now built around knowledge neither of them can forget.

The house Catherine regarded as a prize becomes a reminder of everything the family has done to possess it.

Sheila’s Diamond Earrings: Catherine’s Moral Corruption

The stolen earrings expose Catherine more effectively than almost anything else she does.

Catherine presents herself as polished, successful, and respectable, but when she discovers her murdered mother, her instinct is not to call for help. She takes something valuable from Sheila’s body.

That moment reveals how thoroughly Fred’s values have infected his children. Catherine may not be a murderer like Jenna, but she has learned the same fundamental lesson: when an opportunity presents itself, take what you can and protect yourself afterward.

The earrings also explain why Catherine cannot simply become the moral hero once she learns Jenna is guilty. She has already compromised herself.

Jenna Wins by Understanding Her Family

Jenna’s greatest weapon at the end isn’t her ability to murder without leaving evidence. It is her understanding of her siblings.

She knows Catherine and Dan will not sacrifice themselves merely to see her punished. Their shared guilt creates a form of mutually assured destruction: if one sibling starts telling the truth, everyone becomes vulnerable.

For perhaps the first time, the Merton children genuinely cooperate.

The irony is that the only thing capable of uniting this dysfunctional family is their collective need to conceal wrongdoing and protect their money.

Fred’s Legacy Lives On

Fred dies, but the family dynamic he created survives him.

His cruelty, manipulation, obsession with money, and habit of using vulnerability against others have been absorbed by his children. Jenna uses secrets as weapons. Catherine prioritizes status and inheritance. Dan lies to protect himself. Their relationships remain transactional and suspicious even after the tyrannical father at the center of the family is gone.

In that sense, killing Fred does not free them from him.

They have become versions of him.


Why Audrey Matters in the Final Scene

Audrey prevents the ending from becoming completely nihilistic.

The police have failed. Catherine and Dan will not expose Jenna. Jenna believes she has successfully manipulated everyone who could threaten her.

But Audrey has no reason to participate in the siblings’ pact.

More importantly, Fred himself inadvertently gives Audrey the means to destroy Jenna: the $1 million inheritance. Jenna murders Fred partly because she fears losing his money to Audrey, only for Fred’s bequest to finance Audrey’s attempt to uncover Jenna’s crime.

That gives the ending a wonderfully dark irony. The money Jenna killed to protect may ultimately be what brings her down.

Audrey’s motives are not especially noble—her pursuit of Jenna is fueled by resentment and vengeance as much as justice—but that fits the novel. Not a Happy Family does not suddenly introduce a morally pure character to restore order. Instead, one damaged member of the family may finally expose another.


The Bigger Meaning of the Ending

At its core, the ending is about what happens when a family values money and self-preservation more than love or loyalty.

Fred’s death should remove the source of the Merton family’s dysfunction. Instead, it reveals how deeply that dysfunction has already spread. His children inherit far more than his millions: they inherit his suspicion, selfishness, cruelty, and willingness to manipulate the people closest to them.

The title becomes especially fitting by the end. The Mertons are not merely “not a happy family.” They are a family in which intimacy itself has become dangerous. Everyone knows something incriminating about someone else, and every relationship contains the possibility of betrayal.

The ending therefore denies the reader the clean resolution of a conventional murder mystery. The killer is revealed to us, but not caught. Justice remains unfinished.

And yet Jenna’s victory feels temporary.

The final image of Audrey preparing to buy the land transforms the concrete slab from Jenna’s perfect hiding place into a countdown. Somewhere underneath it lies everything necessary to unravel her carefully constructed story.

Jenna has escaped justice for now.

But the truth is still buried there, waiting for someone willing to dig.

🔶 Main Characters

Fred Merton
Fred Merton — Wealthy Patriarch and Murder Victim
Role: Tyrannical patriarch, former owner of Merton Robotics, and father of Catherine, Dan, Jenna, and secret daughter Rose.
Personality: Cruel, narcissistic, controlling, emotionally abusive.
Significance: His lifelong abuse and threats over his fortune give nearly everyone in the family a motive for murder.
Sheila Merton
Sheila Merton — Submissive Matriarch and Murder Victim
Role: Fred’s wife and mother of Catherine, Dan, and Jenna.
Personality: Anxious, passive, shallow, compliant.
Significance: Her failure to protect her children from Fred creates lasting resentment, while her Xanax prescription initially attracts police attention.
Jenna Merton
Jenna Merton — Youngest Sibling and Killer
Role: Youngest Merton daughter, rebellious sculptor, and the true murderer.
Personality: Provocative, manipulative, remorseless, cold-blooded.
Significance: After Fred threatens to leave half his fortune to Audrey, Jenna steals Dan’s hazmat suit and Irena’s car, murders both parents, and buries the evidence beneath a concrete foundation.
Catherine Merton
Catherine Merton — Eldest Sibling and Dermatologist
Role: Eldest Merton daughter, successful dermatologist, and wife of Ted Linsmore.
Personality: Polished, calculating, materialistic, ruthless.
Significance: She discovers her parents’ bodies before anyone else but steals Sheila’s diamond earrings and leaves without calling police, partly to protect the inheritance.
Dan Merton
Dan Merton — Middle Sibling and Only Son
Role: Unemployed MBA graduate, Fred’s only son, and an early prime suspect.
Personality: Insecure, volatile, depressed, desperate.
Significance: Fred’s abuse leaves him emotionally damaged, while Rose’s $500,000 real-estate scam and disposable coveralls found in his garage make him look especially guilty.
Irena Dabrowski:
Irena Dabrowski — Longtime Housekeeper and Former Nanny
Role: The Mertons’ longtime housekeeper and former nanny who effectively helped raise the children.
Personality: Loyal, maternal, hardworking, protective.
Significance: After discovering the bodies, she cleans the bloody murder knife to destroy fingerprints and protect whichever Merton child she assumes committed the killings.
Detective Eric Reyes
Detective Eric Reyes — Lead Homicide Detective
Role: Lead detective investigating Fred and Sheila’s murders.
Personality: Methodical, observant, grounded, persistent.
Significance: He exposes the siblings’ lies, follows the financial evidence, and eventually connects Jenna to Irena’s car through DNA from a strand of hair.
Audrey Stancik
Audrey Stancik — Fred’s Widowed Sister
Role: Fred’s bitter widowed sister and aunt to the Merton children.
Personality: Vindictive, observant, greedy, stubborn.
Significance: Her claim that Fred promised her half his fortune triggers Jenna’s murders, and Jenna later attempts to silence her by poisoning her with antifreeze.
Rose Cutter
Rose Cutter — Real Estate Attorney and Secret Sibling
Role: Struggling attorney, Catherine’s former friend, and Fred’s secret illegitimate daughter.
Personality: Ambitious, greedy, desperate, secretive.
Significance: After secretly learning she is named in Fred’s will, she fraudulently takes $500,000 from Dan and loses it on a stock speculation.

🔷 Supporting Characters

Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Ted Linsmore — Catherine’s Husband
Role: Dentist and husband of Catherine.
Personality: Cautious, conventional, conflicted, morally uneasy.
Significance: He lies to police to protect Catherine after her secret trip to the murder scene.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Lisa Merton — Dan’s Wife
Role: Dan’s supportive wife.
Personality: Anxious, loyal, empathetic, practical.
Significance: She gives Dan a false alibi and supports him through the murder investigation and financial disaster.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Jake Brenner — Jenna’s Boyfriend
Role: Struggling artist and Jenna’s boyfriend.
Personality: Charming, opportunistic, self-serving, guarded.
Significance: He initially lies to provide Jenna an alibi until surveillance footage proves he left Aylesford before the murders.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Detective Barr — Reyes’s Partner
Role: Homicide detective assisting Reyes.
Personality: Sharp, curious, macabre, composed.
Significance: She helps conduct interviews, evaluate evidence, and gradually dismantle the Mertons’ stories.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Ellen Cutter — Rose’s Mother
Role: Rose’s widowed mother and Fred’s former executive secretary.
Personality: Reserved, protective, anxious, quiet.
Significance: Her affair with Fred produced Rose, whom Fred secretly supported financially while Ellen raised her alone.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Walter Temple — Corporate and Estate Attorney
Role: Fred’s longtime attorney and senior partner at Temple Black.
Personality: Professional, formal, connected, discreet.
Significance: He administers the Merton estates, reveals Rose as an heir, and discovers that Janet improperly leaked information from Fred’s will.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Janet Shewcuk — Junior Law Associate
Role: Junior attorney at Temple Black and Rose’s former law-school classmate.
Personality: Naive, intimidated, remorseful.
Significance: She secretly tells Rose that Fred named her in his will, setting in motion Rose’s fraudulent attempt to obtain money before Fred dies.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Amir Ghorbani — Wealthy Resident
Role: Owner of the property Rose falsely uses as collateral in Dan’s supposed investment.
Personality: Cautious, wealthy, protective.
Significance: He exposes Rose’s fraud by confirming he never borrowed money from Dan and reveals that he had Dan investigated for repeatedly watching his house.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Carl Brink — Local Driver
Role: Young local man whose distinctive pickup is spotted near Brecken Hill.
Personality: Sullen, nervous, reckless.
Significance: Initially investigated because of his truck, he becomes an important witness instead.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Dr. Sandy Fisher — Forensic Pathologist
Role: Pathologist who performs the Merton autopsies.
Personality: Clinical, objective, professional.
Significance: Her findings establish the victims’ causes and approximate times of death and reveal Fred’s hidden pancreatic cancer.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
May Bannerjee — Head of Forensics
Role: Lead forensic investigator processing the Merton crime scene.
Personality: Competent, meticulous, methodical.
Significance: She determines that someone picked the murder knife out of dried blood, washed it, and returned it to the knife block.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Caroline Temple — Walter Temple’s Wife
Role: Walter’s wife and Sheila’s social acquaintance.
Personality: Perceptive, outspoken, gossipy.
Significance: She gives detectives valuable insight into Fred’s cruelty and Sheila’s anxiety about his changing estate plans.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Richard Klein — Criminal Defense Attorney
Role: Powerful defense attorney hired to represent Dan.
Personality: Sharp, assertive, strategic, protective.
Significance: He prevents police from exploiting Dan’s emotional instability and financial troubles during questioning.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Robin Fontaine — Crime Reporter
Role: Reporter for the Aylesford Record.
Personality: Persistent, ambitious, sensationalist.
Significance: She reports aggressively on the murders and uses Audrey’s anonymous leaks to expose the Mertons’ ugly family secrets.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Barbara — Ellen Cutter’s Sister
Role: Ellen’s sister and Rose’s aunt.
Personality: Cheerful, supportive.
Significance: Her Easter visit inadvertently gives Ellen a solid alibi for the night of the murders.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Dr. Wang — Attending Hospital Physician
Role: Doctor who treats Audrey after Jenna poisons her.
Personality: Efficient, brisk.
Significance: He recognizes and treats Audrey’s severe ethylene glycol poisoning with fomepizole.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Jim Alvarez — Medical Examiner
Role: Medical examiner involved in recovering Fred and Sheila’s bodies.
Personality: Professional, procedural.
Significance: He coordinates removal of the bodies and the formal examination process.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Tina Metheney — Dan’s High School Crush
Role: Dan’s former high-school classmate and crush.
Personality: Unyielding, unreceptive.
Significance: Her rejection led teenage Dan to repeatedly watch her house, resulting in a humiliating confrontation with Fred that helps explain Dan’s later compulsive nighttime driving.
Gemini_Generated_Image_9tlzoi9tlzoi9tlz
Kelly — Rose Cutter’s Law Assistant
Role: Assistant at Rose’s struggling law office.
Personality: Obedient, peripheral.
Significance: She witnesses the beginning of Rose’s professional collapse when police scrutiny closes in.
Jenna’s Convenient Access to Dan’s Hazmat Suit

Jenna’s plan depends on Dan being away, his garage being unlocked, and an unused disposable coverall from an old insulation project still being exactly where she expects it to be. This is extremely convenient, but not necessarily a plot hole. Jenna knows her brother and may know both his habits and what he keeps in his garage. It is better viewed as a risky logistical gamble that happens to work rather than an actual contradiction.

The Single Strand of Hair

The police’s strongest physical evidence against Jenna is a single strand of her hair found in the driver’s seat of Irena’s car. Yet Jenna is specifically described as pulling the hood of her disposable coverall tightly around her face so that no hair is exposed. That makes it difficult to explain how she shed a hair while driving. The defense’s secondary-transfer explanation—that Irena picked up the hair while hugging Jenna and later transferred it to the seat—is actually plausible, but if so, the hair may have nothing to do with the murders at all. This is a genuine inconsistency in how the incriminating hair is presented.

Q : How does Fred Merton’s treatment of his children continue to shape Catherine, Dan, and Jenna as adults? Do you think they would have become very different people if they had grown up with a more supportive father?
A : Fred’s constant criticism, favoritism, and use of money as a weapon leave all three siblings damaged in different ways. Catherine becomes preoccupied with success, appearances, and proving that she is the favored child. Dan is deeply insecure and desperate for his father’s approval, while Jenna responds by becoming rebellious and emotionally detached. Their very different personalities suggest that children can respond differently to the same abusive environment, but Fred’s influence remains visible in all of them.
Q : Sheila spends years living under Fred’s domineering personality, but she also repeatedly fails to protect her children from him. How much responsibility do you think she bears for what happened within the Merton family?
A : Sheila is both a victim and an enabler. Fred intimidates and controls her, and her dependence on Xanax suggests how difficult she finds life with him. At the same time, her children needed a parent willing to defend them, and Sheila repeatedly chooses avoidance instead. That makes her sympathetic without necessarily making her innocent. Her passivity allows Fred’s cruelty to become the defining force in the household.
Q : Irena cleans the bloody knife before calling the police because she immediately fears that one of the Merton children may have killed their parents. Does her motivation make her interference more understandable, or does she cross a line that loyalty cannot excuse?
A : Irena essentially raised the children, so her instinct is maternal rather than rational. She sees Catherine, Dan, and Jenna as people she needs to protect even when they are adults, and cleaning the knife is an impulsive attempt to shield them. Her love makes the decision understandable, but it also shows the danger of unconditional loyalty. She is willing to obstruct justice without even knowing whether one of them is guilty.
Q : Catherine has always been the successful, respectable child in the family. How does her behavior after discovering her parents’ bodies challenge that image of her?
A : Catherine’s reaction exposes how much of her respectable identity is a facade. Instead of immediately calling the police, she takes her mother’s valuable diamond earrings and leaves the scene. She later lies to protect herself and her inheritance. Catherine may not be a murderer, but the crisis reveals that she shares some of Fred’s selfishness and obsession with wealth beneath her polished exterior.
Q : Dan looks increasingly guilty as the investigation progresses even though he did not kill his parents. Why do you think the novel makes the innocent sibling behave like such a convincing suspect?
A : Dan demonstrates how easily secrecy, fear, and desperation can resemble guilt. He has financial problems, no convincing alibi, disposable protective clothing in his garage, and a tendency to react badly under pressure. Because he is hiding other humiliating secrets, he cannot simply tell the police everything. His storyline also plays with the reader’s assumptions: suspicious behavior does not necessarily mean someone is hiding the crime being investigated.
Q : Jenna’s decision to murder her parents follows Fred’s humiliation of her and his threat to give half his fortune to Audrey. Do you see money as Jenna’s primary motive, or is the inheritance simply the final trigger after years of resentment?
A : The money seems more like a catalyst than the entire motive. Jenna has spent her life being belittled by Fred, particularly over her artistic ambitions, and Easter dinner brings those resentments to a breaking point. His threat concerning the inheritance gives her an immediate financial reason to act, but the brutality of the murders suggests much deeper rage. Money explains why she acts at that particular moment; years of family dysfunction help explain the intensity of the violence.
Q : Almost everyone begins thinking about money surprisingly quickly after Fred and Sheila are murdered. What do you think the novel is suggesting about the effect of wealth on this family?
A : The inheritance exposes relationships that were already transactional. Fred spent years using money to reward, punish, and control people, so it makes sense that his children continue thinking about him in financial terms even after his death. Instead of bringing the family security, wealth creates suspicion and competition. The novel suggests that money itself may not corrupt the Mertons so much as reveal values Fred has spent decades teaching them.
Q : Rose’s appearance as Fred’s secret fourth child initially makes her seem like another possible suspect. Beyond providing a red herring, what does she add to the story?
A : Rose expands the consequences of Fred’s behavior beyond the family members we first meet. His secrecy and selfishness have affected another daughter and another household, while Rose’s financial deception becomes tangled with Dan’s suspicious behavior. Her existence also destabilizes the siblings’ sense of entitlement: suddenly the family and fortune they thought they understood are not quite what they believed them to be.
Q : The investigation forces Catherine and Dan to reveal secrets they had been keeping from their spouses. What does the novel suggest about how well Ted and Lisa actually knew the people they married?
A : Both marriages appear stable until the murder investigation puts them under pressure. Ted discovers that Catherine can lie, steal, and protect her financial interests in ways he never imagined, while Lisa learns how much Dan has concealed about their finances and his late-night activities. The investigation becomes almost a stress test for their marriages, raising the uncomfortable question of whether we ever completely know the people closest to us.
Q : Fred killed his own abusive father as a teenager, and Jenna eventually murders Fred and Sheila. Do you think the novel presents violence in the Merton family as something inherited, learned, or both?
A : The book deliberately leaves room for both interpretations. Audrey worries about violence running through the family, and Jenna’s coldness can make a genetic explanation tempting. But Fred himself grew up with an abusive father and then created an abusive household for his own children. That pattern also supports the idea of violence and cruelty being passed down through behavior and trauma rather than biology alone.
Q : Jenna ultimately avoids arrest because the police cannot build a strong enough case against her. Did that ending feel frustrating, satisfying, or appropriate for this particular family?
A : The lack of an arrest can be frustrating because readers eventually know exactly what Jenna did. Yet a neat conviction might feel almost too tidy for a story built around secrecy and mutual distrust. Jenna escapes formal punishment, but she does not restore the family to anything resembling normality. Everyone is left suspicious of everyone else, suggesting that the Mertons may have inherited something more damaging than money.
Q : Jenna believes that burying the physical evidence beneath newly poured concrete will permanently conceal what she has done, but Audrey’s actions threaten to expose it. What do you think the buried evidence represents by the end of the novel?
A : The concrete becomes a fitting symbol for the Merton family’s habit of covering up uncomfortable truths and pretending they have disappeared. Jenna believes she can literally seal away her crime, just as the family has spent years burying abuse, resentment, affairs, financial problems, and other secrets. Audrey’s decision to buy the property suggests that buried truths have a way of resurfacing, leaving Jenna—and the reader—with the possibility that the story is not really over.
5 / 5 Stars · Linda’s Rating

Not a Happy Family is exactly the kind of domestic thriller I love: fast-paced, twisty, and packed with enough dysfunctional family drama to keep me suspicious of absolutely everyone. I was hooked from the beginning and flew through it.

What worked especially well for me was how relatable the Merton family felt. These aren’t cartoon villains or ridiculously over-the-top suspects—they’re deeply flawed people carrying years of resentment, jealousy, financial pressure, and emotional baggage. Fred’s constant criticism and manipulation create a family dynamic where practically everyone has a legitimate reason to hate him, which makes the mystery genuinely difficult to solve.

I also loved the pacing. There was always another secret coming out, another character behaving suspiciously, or another piece of information that made me rethink my theory. Shari Lapena kept me guessing without making the story unnecessarily complicated.

More than anything, though, the family dynamics hit home for me. The pressure of never quite living up to a parent’s expectations gave the story an emotional layer beyond the murder mystery. Messy, addictive, and ridiculously entertaining—this is domestic suspense done exactly right.

5 out of 5 stars -- Everyone Has a Motive. No One Has an Alibi.

As of September 2026, there is no official announcement of any screen adaptation of Not a Happy Family.

The Family Game (2022)
Catherine Steadman
The Inheritance Games (2020)
Jennifer Lynn Barnes
The Heiress (2024)
Rachel Hawkins
The Only One Left (2023)
Riley Sager
The Last Mrs. Parrish (2017)
Liv Constantine
The Wife Between Us (2018)
Greer Hendricks
The Couple Next Door (2016)
Shari Lapena
The Guest List (2020)
Lucy Foley
The Paris Apartment (2022)
Lucy Foley
The Death of Mrs. Westaway (2018)
Ruth Ware
The Lies I Tell (2022)
Julie Clark
The Last House Guest (2019)
Megan Miranda

See an error on this page?

Searching...

Report an Error

Help keep SPILLTHEPLOT accurate. We’ll review your report promptly.
📖 Reporting for: Not a Happy Family (2021)